Showing posts with label false claims. Show all posts
Showing posts with label false claims. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 19, 2011

CVS pays $17.5 Million to Settle Medicaid Fraud Lawsuit

Stephani LeFlore, as Relator for the United States v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. -
CVS, the giant retail pharmacy chain, has agreed to pay $17.5 Million to settle a whistleblower lawsuit accusing it of Medicaid fraud.  According to her False Claims Acts lawsuit, CVS pharmacist Stephani LeFlore of Minnesota brought evidence to the government that CVS used a billing system for years that was designed to overbill Medicaid on prescription charges.  The billing was done in relation to dual-eligible customers - those legitimately on Medicaid who also maintained their private health insurance coverage. The insurance coverages required CVS to charge the insurance company a smaller amount for prescriptions, and limited co-pay from the customer. When a person is allowed Medicaid coverage, the government always obtains an assignment of the person's rights under their private health insurance coverage. The government essentially takes over the citizen's rights under the coverage. This includes the common right to pay a smaller co-pay amount on prescriptions.

Ms. LeFlore claimed in her federal and state lawsuits that CVS should only have billed the Medicaid program the same limited co-pay on prescriptions that it would have normally billed the customer under the insurance plan.  She alleged that CVS designed a billing software program for its pharmacies that consistently overcharged Medicaid on these co-pays.  She claimed that these overcharges occurred on hundreds of thousands of prescription sales for well over five years.

The $17.5 Million settlement covers over-billings by CVS in the states of Minnesota,California, Massachusetts, Michigan, Florida, Indiana, Alabama, Nevada, New Hampshire and Rhode Island.

Ms. LeFlore first complained internally, but she was told by a supervisor that “corporate took care of the billing” and that she need not be concerned.
The lawsuit stayed under seal (non-public), according to the False Claims Acts and court orders, until the announcement of this settlement. The civil reward totaled $2,595,460.00.

This case is just another example of the way in which Medicaid fraud occurs.  In my professional experience, usually whistleblowers try to report the fraud internally and hope that the company will "do the right thing" before they actually bring information to the government.  In this case, Ms. LeFlore reported it to CVS and she was told that corporate took care of the billing.  This is another lesson for companies to better their internal reporting structures. 

Claudine Q. Homolash, Esq. is an attorney who represents whistleblowers in a variety of lawsuits, including pharmaceutical fraud and billing.  She can be reached at (215) 790-7379 or chomolash@sheller.com

Friday, February 25, 2011

J&J Accused of Fraud - Risperdal

A former Johnson & Johnson sales manager accused the health care giant of concocting various schemes to defraud federal and state Medicaid programs in a lawsuit that was filed in 2005, but only recently unsealed amid a transfer of the litigation from a federal court in Pennsylvania to another in Massachusetts.

The lawsuit was filed by Scott Bartz, a New Jersey resident who worked as a sales compensation manager from 1999 until 2007, when he alleges he was terminated in retaliation for repeatedly complaining about illegal marketing practices. His lawsuit also names the Omnicare nursing home operator and McKesson, the pharmaceutical wholesaler.

In his Complaint, Bartz charged J&J manipulated sales data; reported false prices to various government health programs, and paid kickbacks, such as rebates, so its Risperdal Consta antipsychotic and Razadyne Alzheimer’s treatment would be more widely prescribed. He also alleged J&J practiced channel stuffing, an accounting gimmick used to boost sales to distributors at year’s end.

The lawsuit, which is one of many filed in federal court in Boston that accuse J&J of such practices, has been amended twice, but the latest version remains under seal. The feds, however, have not intervened, or joined, his lawsuit. For his trouble, Bartz suffered a heart attack at age 44, despite being in good health, due to the stress associated with filing on-the-job complaints and was unable to find work, prompting his lawyers to help arrange for loans, according to court documents.

Last November, J&J disclosed talks were being held with the feds about settling charges of illegal marketing of its Risperdal antipsychotic after denying claims contained in a separate lawsuit that made claims similar to those alleged by Bartz. The lawsuit was disclosed by Omnicare in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission and first reported by Dow Jones.

SHELLER P.C. represents many people who have been injured by the drug Risperdal and its related version, Invega.